Ekalavya and Arjuna AND Adbhuta Mandira and Bhaktivinoda's Vision

Posted in Labels:












Ekalavya and Arjuna




( by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura)



Many people consider Ekalavya’s 'guru-bhakti' to be ideal, but there is a unique deliberation concerning this topic.
King Hiranyadhanu's son was named Ekalavya. Ekalavya was, by caste, a nisadha (candala). In order to learn astra-vidya, Prince Ekalavya approached Dronacarya. Because Ekalavya possessed a low class mentality, the acarya refused to initiate him in the teachings of the Dhanur-Veda. However, Ekalavya was determined to learn the martial arts from Dronacarya and went off into the forest. There he constructed an idol of Dronacarya made of clay and by continuously practicing in front of that artificial guru he became very expert in astra-vidya.
Arjuna was Dronacarya's most beloved disciple. The acarya had told Arjuna that none of Dronacarya's disciples would ever be able to excel Arjuna in skill.
One day Dronacarya instructed the Kauravas and the Pandavas to leave the royal capital and go to the forest for hunting. As they made their way through the forest, they saw a dog whose mouth had been blocked with seven arrows. Seeing this, they were most astonished. Whoever had shot these arrows was far more expert than the Pandavas. Realizing this, they went in search of that person. Gradually they understood that it was Ekalavya, the son of Hiranyadhanu, who had tested his archery skills on the dog's mouth.
The Pandavas returned to the capital and, approaching Dronacarya, submitted this unusual story to him. With a mood of humility, Arjuna told Dronacarya that it seemed that he had another disciple who was more expert in archery than Arjuna. Dronacarya listened to these words and was surprised. He went with Arjuna into the forest and there they saw Ekalavya continuously shooting arrows like rain, fully absorbed in the science of archery. 
Taking the opportunity Dronacarya came forward and approached Ekalavya, and seeing the acarya, Ekalavya immediately offered his prayers at his feet, and with folded hands he introduced himself as his disciple and remained standing. Dronacarya told Ekalavya, "You must give guru-daksina."
Ekalavya replied, "Please tell me – whatever it is, I am ready to give it!"
Then Dronacarya told Ekalavya to cut off his thumb and give him that as his guru-daksina. Ekalavya executed the order of his Gurudeva. Ekalavya did not protest in any way and unhesitatingly executed his guru's instruction.
Initially Ekalavya's guru rejected him because he considered him to be born of a low caste, yet due to his faith in Dronacarya, he established a clay deity of him and became invincible – thus his guru-bhakti was established as ideal. On the other hand, Arjuna was envious towards Ekalavya, because by his perseverance, Ekalavya had become expert; therefore Ekalavya was ruined by Dronacarya – this is the common opinion.
But this is not the opinion of the devotees, nor is it a true conception. Everything about Bhagavan is supremely true, everything about the principles of devotion are supremely true and everything in relation to the devotee is supremely true. These are the three truths – Bhagavan, bhakti and bhakta. Everything a devotee does is good; everything a non-devotee does is not very good. The non-devotee has many bad qualities because he is not engaged in satisfying the senses of Bhagavan. Those that think that mundane laws are greater than Bhagavan cannot accommodate those words regarding the supreme truth. Such persons are nirvisesavadis (impersonalists) which is to say that they cannot accept the non-differentiated specialty of Bhagavan, bhakti and bhakta.
What was Ekalavya’s fault? This analysis is essential. He wore the mask of guru-bhakti, yet he was actually inimical towards his guru. Whether his guru actually considered Ekalavya to be disqualified by his low-birth, or was simply testing him — whatever the reason may be, when his Gurudeva did not wish to teach him the science of warfare, it was Ekalavya’s duty to accept his guru's instruction upon his head; but Ekalavya did not accept that. He had the aspiration to become great.
Externally, without a guru, his practices would not have been considered lawful, or he would not be in a favorable position to become great without accepting a guru. To this end, Ekalavya concocted a clay form of his 'guru'. He only did this to attain greatness by learning the Dhanur-veda. In this way, his main intention was to satisfy his own senses. He did not offer himself as a sacrifice to his guru's desire and his own intentions were not sincere. Some may say that ultimately Ekalavya happily accepted the heartless order of his guru without protest, but if we consider this topic deeply and with keen discernment, we can observe that Ekalavya considered mundane morality to be superior to transcendental devotion. When the guru requests something to be given as daksina, then one must offer it to him – it was that sense of morality that inspired him to cut off his thumb. Ekalavya did not offer it with spontaneous devotion. The very nature of bhakti is that it is spontaneous and simple.
If Ekalavya had unmotivated and natural devotion within his heart towards Hari, Guru and Vaisnava, then the guru, Dronacarya, the best of Vaisnavas, Arjuna, and Bhagavan Sri Krsna, would not have been displeased with his behavior. Ekalavya’s attempt to learn the Dhanur-veda and his hankering to become great were not accepted by his Gurudeva. Deep within Ekalavya’s heart, he desired to try and become greater than Arjuna, the best of Vaisnavas. The aspiration to become greater than the Vaisnavas is not devotion – it is anti-devotional and it is the dharma of the Ativadis (1). According to worldly considerations, the desire to become great is regarded as good. But the effort to take a subordinate position behind a Vaisnava and the attempt to take shelter of a Vaisnava – that is bhakti.
Ekalavya wanted his expertise to be greater than that which could be acquired by learning Vedic sciences directly from a mahanta-guru – Arjuna notified Dronacarya of this. If Arjuna had not mercifully pointed this out, then the victory of impersonalism would have been proclaimed extensively. People would not have approached a mahanta-guru to accept any type of knowledge; they would have desired to create their own contradictory, concocted, clay, lifeless gurus in order to learn various sciences or devotional teachings. In this way, atheistic theories would have been established. Therefore, Arjuna had no envy towards Ekalavya; it was actually his causeless compassion towards Ekalavya and the world.
If Ekalavya had been an honest devotee of his guru, then Krsna would not have killed such a guru-bhakta – He always protects His devotees. But finally Ekalavya was killed by the hand of Krsna. This is how Ekalavya finally met his end (2).
Sri Caitanyadeva has said that we cannot judge devotion simply on the basis of external austerities. The asuras perform penances that even the demigods cannot perform (3). Against the wishes of his guru, Ekalavya wanted to become greater than the Vaisnava. Therefore he was killed by Krsna and attained impersonal liberation. Asuras are always killed by Krsna and the devotees of the Lord are protected by Krsna (4). The proof of this is Hiranyakasipu and Prahlada. Thus we should never attempt to become greater than the Vaisnavas. If we do not wear a mask of guru-bhakti, we will never become impersonalists. This is what the pure devotees have taught in relation to the narrative of Ekalavya. Expertise in performing mundane activities is not guru-bhakti. Taking shelter of the Vaisnavas is actually true devotion.
(From Upakhyane Upadesa, Vol. 2)

FOOTNOTES:
(1) The Ativadis are an apasampradaya that originated in Orissa under one Jagannatha Dasa during the time of Mahaprabhu. The word 'ativadi' means 'one who thinks he is very inteligent' (ati – very, vadi – intelligent). For more information, see Krsna Talk No.32 (http://gosai.com/writings/ativadi-apa-sampradaya)
(2) Ekalavya’s demise is found in Chapter 48 of the Udyoga-parva of Mahabharata wherein Krsna kills him as He battles with Jarasandha’s army.
(3) asure o tapa kare, ki haya tahara
     vine mora sarana laile nahi para (Cb. Madhya 23.46)
(4) Madhvacarya, in his Mahabharata Tataparya Nirnaya has commented that Ekalavya was the amsa of the demon Manimanta.
yuddhva ciram rana mukhe bhagavat sutah asau
cakre nirayudham amum sthiram ekalavyam
amsena yo bhuvam agat maniman iti sma
sa krodha tantraka ganesu adhipo nisadah
Fighting for a long time with Ekalavya, who was steadfast in battlefield, Pradyumna rendered him weaponless. Previously there was a group of demons known as the Krodha-tantra-ganas, amongst whom there was a prominent demon named Manimanta. Ekalavya is the amsa of that Manimanta. (MTN 14.40)










Adbhuta Mandira and Bhaktivinoda's Vision


(Swami B.G. Narasingha)

Question: I have read your articles about the Adbhuta Mandira being built at Yogapitha but I have also seen a video, The New World of Hare Krishna, wherein a sannyasi is standing on the roof of Bhaktivinoda's house in Godrumadvipa and he is pointing in the direction of Mayapura and saying that from there on the roof Bhaktivinoda had a vision of the Adbhuta Mandira. The sannyasi is indicating that since the ISKCON project is in between Bhaktivinoda's house and Mayapura that it must be ISKCON that is going to build the Adbhuta Mandira. Do you have any comment of this?

Swami Narasingha: That is of course ISKCON's misunderstanding, a novel idea, but such thinking was not present in the time of Srila Prabhupada (A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami) nor is it a fact.
In the first place Bhaktivinoda Thakura was not staying in Godrumadvipa when he had his vision of the Adbhuta Mandira. In fact Bhaktivinoda's house at Godruma was not built until two years later. Bhaktivinoda's house, Svananda Sukhada Kunja, was constructed in 1889 whereas his vision of the Adbhuta Mandira occurred in 1887 when he was staying at the Rani Dharmasala across the Ganga in Navadvipa town. Rani Dharmasala is the same place where Gaura-kishora Dasa Babaji used to spend much of his time doing bhajana.
Bhaktivinoda was living and working in government service at Krsnanagara during those days. He used to come to Navadvipa on the weekends to try to find out the places of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's pastimes. Bhaktivinoda has mentioned that he was especially disappointed in that the residents of Navadvipa were not very interested in such things (he has specifically mentioned that they only pay heed to their stomach). It was on one such visit to Navadvipa when he was staying at the Rani Dharmasala that Bhaktivinoda had the vision of the Adbhuta Mandira.
One Saturday evening Bhaktivinoda was standing on the roof of the dharmasala with his son Kamala Prasada and a clerk from his office. He was looking in a northerly direction when a brilliant light appeared on the horizon across the Ganga. Within that effulgence appeared the Adbhuta Mandira.
When looking in the northerly direction from the place where Bhaktivinoda was standing the present day ISKCON project does not come into view and even if it did the point to remember is that the vision of the Adbhuta Mandira was specifically revealing the birth site of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, therefore the Adbhuta Mandira must be built at Yogapitha and not just anywhere in Mayapura.
Bhaktivinoda had the vision of the Adbhuta Mandir on two consecutive occasions. Some years later in a letter to one of his sons Bhaktivinoda detailed the experience of his vision of the Adbhuta Mandira and the events that led to the discovery of Mahaprabhu's birth site (Yogapitha) in Mayapura. That segment of Bhaktivinoda's letter follows:
"During the Christmas break I took a train to Navadvipa with my wife. Arriving there and seeing the land in all four directions the hair on my body stood on end. Upon crossing the Ganga, and I went to Rani Dharmasala and I made arrangements to cook for Sriman Mahaprabhu. Having taken darsana of the Lord with difficultly I honored prasada at around 1 o'clock. After 45 days [of dieting], I took grains, jackfruit dahl, banana-flour sabji, and soup etc., which were like nectar. Since my very birth I had not eaten such nectarine food. Even Bimal ate everything on his plate, and with great devotion.
"We had to go to the house at Krsnanagara before evening and thus, buying some cooking pots and utensils, and quickly crossing [the river], we took the train to Krsnanagara. The next day I went to Baro Gosvami's house in Santipura, took prasada, and before evening returned home. At that time I was beginning to become strong. Every Saturday, I went to Navadvipa to search out the places of the lila of the Lord, but I did not find many and I was very unhappy. At the present time the people of Navadvipa only pay heed to their stomach etc. They do not make even a little effort in relation to the places of the lila of the Lord. One night, Kamala and a clerk and I went up on the roof in order to look around.
"It was 10 o'clock, and was very dark and cloudy. Across the Ganga, in a northerly direction, I saw a large building flooded with light. I asked Kamala (if he saw it) and he said he had. I asked the clerk and he said, "I did not see anything." Because of that I was utterly amazed. In the morning I looked carefully at the place [where I saw the building] from the roof of the Rani Dharmasala, and I observed that there was one Tal tree in that location. When I asked others about this place they said that this distant place was known as Ballaldighi and that the remains of the fort etc. of Laksmana Sena were close by. That Monday I returned to Krsnanagara and the following Saturday I went back to Ballaldighi. I saw that wonderful phenomenon in that place again at night, and the next day I went to see the area on foot. Upon inquiring of the elderly people of that place, I was informed that this was the birthplace of Sriman Mahaprabhu. I gradually saw everything (in the area) and ascertained where all the small villages mentioned in the Caitanya-bhagavata and in Narahari Thakura's Bhakti-ratnakara and Parikrama Paddhati were.
"While staying in Krsnanagara I wrote Sri Navadvipa-Dhama Mahatmya and sent it to Calcutta to be printed. I explained all these matters to Dvarik Babu, an engineer from Krsnanagara, and through the strength of his intellect understood everything. He made a map of the area around Navadvipa for me. That also was printed in a reduced form in Dhama Mahatmya. While I travelled around Navadvipa Dhama and wrote Navadvipa-dhama Mahatmya I saw that there was very little opportunity to do more." (Bhaktivinoda's letter to Lalita Prasad, written 1896)
We have been criticized by some of our friends for making too much of the issue of the Adbhuta Mandira but we see no advantage in distorting the facts, allowing such distortions to flourish or in denying the reality that Bhaktivinoda's vision was fulfilled by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta who constructed the Adbhuta Mandira at Yogapitha in 1933 - which is indeed a most wonderful temple.
One devotee from ISKCON has written to suggest that "Couldn't there be two Adbhuta Mandiras, one at Yogapitha and one at ISKCON?" But that would be tantamount to saying, "Couldn't there be two founder-acaryas of ISKCON?" - obviously unacceptable!
Of course there can be many wonderful temples at Mayapur and indeed there are, but we should remember that 'big isn't always best'- small is beautiful, small is also wonderful. In spiritual life proper conception is everything and the vision of Bhaktivinoda and the conception of Lord Nityananda, as given in Navadvipa-dhama Mahatmya, is that the Adbhuta Mandira is located at the birth site of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu.
The ISKCON project of late that is being referred to as the Adbhuta Mandira, was originally started by our spiritual master, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Prabhupada, laid the cornerstone of the temple in 1977. Prabhupada however never made any reference to his ambitious temple project being the Adbhuta Mandira. In fact Srila Prabhupada distinctly referred to his project as the Temple of Understanding or the Planetarium. It is only now, within the past decade or so, that some energetic disciples of Prabhupada have hyped up the ISKCON Planetarium project (for fund raising purposes) by calling it the Adbhuta Mandira. This however has no basis. It is indisputable—the Adbhuta Mandira was constructed at Yogapitha in 1933.

 








Om Tat Sat
                                                        
(Continued...) 


(My humble salutations to  H H Sri Swami B G Narasingha ji  and Sri Swamy Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura ji for the collection)


(The Blog  is reverently for all the seekers of truth, lovers of wisdom and   to share the Hindu Dharma with others on the spiritual path and also this is purely  a non-commercial blog)

0 comments